View Full Version : OJ should be killed
lavell12
11-16-2006, 01:34 AM
This murdering bastard now is going around with a series of interviews and a book describing "if he did it, how he did it" in other words a confession to the double murder.
I think the Goldmond family ought to hire a hit man and have this bastard beaten to death.
hotcorner33
11-16-2006, 07:58 AM
This murdering bastard now is going around with a series of interviews and a book describing "if he did it, how he did it" in other words a confession to the double murder.
I think the Goldmond family ought to hire a hit man and have this bastard beaten to death.
agreed. OJ is a horrible man that should have been put to death 12 years ago. Just terrible.
vnodnarb
11-16-2006, 11:13 AM
somebody needs money
FalconPride
11-16-2006, 05:09 PM
Who cares? The LAPD and Marcia Clark failed to make their case and got owned for it. If anyone should be held accountable, it's them.
oyhstah crachah
11-16-2006, 07:20 PM
Not that OJ's a great guy, but killing him and wanting him dead is just retarded.
lavell12
11-17-2006, 05:19 PM
He would have been found guilty and executed along time ago if it happened in a red state.
FalconPride
11-17-2006, 05:36 PM
He would have been found guilty and executed along time ago if it happened in a red state.
Even if the police muffed up the investigation that horribly? Wow. That says more about the idiots in the red state than anything.
nickzilla6066
11-17-2006, 10:52 PM
Even if the police muffed up the investigation that horribly? Wow. That says more about the idiots in the red state than anything.
Perhaps this tells us something about our legal system. A clearly guilty man gets off because of police and prosecution failures. Lets face it. Our legal system is a joke. Lawyers pick the 12 dumbest people they can find during jury selection and lie to them throughout the trial, twisting and turning their already feeble minds until they reach a predetermined point. As opposed to the un-objective defense versus prosecution perhaps we should overhaul the courts to actually determine what HAPPENED, not whose lawyers are better.
FalconPride
11-17-2006, 11:29 PM
Perhaps this tells us something about our legal system. A clearly guilty man gets off because of police and prosecution failures. Lets face it. Our legal system is a joke. Lawyers pick the 12 dumbest people they can find during jury selection and lie to them throughout the trial, twisting and turning their already feeble minds until they reach a predetermined point. As opposed to the un-objective defense versus prosecution perhaps we should overhaul the courts to actually determine what HAPPENED, not whose lawyers are better.
The truth ultimately wins in most cases. There is no perfect way unless we get that whole Minority Report technology working. Yes, O.J. should have been found guilty. But, the burden of proof rests on the state to prove it. That's exactly what our founders wanted. Therefore, the police force has a responsibility to do its job properly under the law.
The courts did its job. The police failed to its. If he was so obviously guilty, the police force needed to prove that. It failed, most of all, the Browns and Goldmans.
hotcorner33
11-20-2006, 06:33 PM
Hallelujiah. Both are cancelled.