View Full Version : Cubs Trade Jones to Tigers Infante
vnodnarb
11-12-2007, 12:58 PM
http://sports.excite.com/news/11122007/v0149.html
Just in case anyone cares even a little bit, I figured I'd post this.
HaRdCoReBrAvEsFaN
11-12-2007, 01:03 PM
decent trade for detroit
McCarroll21
11-12-2007, 01:07 PM
I'm not sure why the Tigers would want another outfielder, and one that isn't really that good.
Granderson, Maybin, Ordonez, Sheffield, Thames ... and now Jones?
JCStone57
11-12-2007, 01:14 PM
:bricks: Point being?
HaRdCoReBrAvEsFaN
11-12-2007, 01:34 PM
I think the point is to platoon Jones with Thames...they might not think Maybin is ready to stick yet...
Scalpel19
11-12-2007, 05:07 PM
Maybin is not where they thought he would be in terms of progress. Thus, they got Jones
JayDonnelly10
11-12-2007, 08:04 PM
The trade seems decent for the Tigers....the Cubs other than dumping some salary and getting rid of Jones which they seem to have wanted to do for sometime, they dont seem like they are really going to benefit in my eyes...
Scalpel19
11-12-2007, 08:53 PM
I think the Tigers may be a bit worried about Maybin or have a deal looming. The likelihood is that he will play at a really high level for many years to come. This just seems like the move of a worried team or a team about to trade an outfielder, even though they gave up little. One would think a half-ready Maybin would be better than Jones.
Granderson could be on the move
JayDonnelly10
11-12-2007, 08:58 PM
I think the Tigers may be a bit worried about Maybin or have a deal looming. The likelihood is that he will play at a really high level for many years to come. This just seems like the move of a worried team or a team about to trade an outfielder, even though they gave up little. One would think a half-ready Maybin would be better than Jones.
Granderson could be on the move
No way is Granderson moving! Maybe for Jake Peavy only? (a joke) but its not going to happen!
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.